Semantics and Pragmatics (forthcoming)

Authors
Lucas Champollion
New York University
Abstract
Donkey sentences have existential and universal readings, but they are not often perceived as ambiguous. We extend the pragmatic theory of nonmaximality in plural definites by Križ (2016) to explain how context disambiguates donkey sentences. We propose that the denotations of such sentences produce truth-value gaps — in certain scenarios the sentences are neither true nor false — and demonstrate that Križ’s pragmatic theory fills these gaps to generate the standard judgments of the literature. Building on Muskens’s (1996) Compositional Discourse Representation Theory and on ideas from supervaluation semantics, the semantic analysis defines a general schema for quantification that delivers the required truth-value gaps. Given the independently motivated pragmatic theory of Križ 2016, we argue that mixed readings of donkey sentences require neither plural information states, contra Brasoveanu 2008, 2010, nor error states, contra Champollion 2016, nor singular donkey pronouns with plural referents, contra Krifka 1996, Yoon 1996. We also show that the pragmatic account improves over alternatives like Kanazawa 1994 that attribute the readings of donkey sentences to the monotonicity properties of the embedding quantifier.
Keywords donkey sentences  dynamic semantics  homogeneity  nonmaximality  Question under Discussion  semantics/pragmatics interface  trivalence  truth-value gaps  weak/strong (existential/universal) ambiguity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Scorekeeping in a Language Game.David Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):339--359.
Vagueness, Truth and Logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Witnesses.Matthew Mandelkern - forthcoming - Linguistics and Philosophy.
The Dynamics of Loose Talk.Sam Carter - 2021 - Noûs 55 (1):171-198.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Donkey Demonstratives.Barbara Abbott - 2002 - Natural Language Semantics 10 (4):285-298.
E-Type Anaphora as NP-Deletion.Paul Elbourne - 2001 - Natural Language Semantics 9 (3):241-288.
Towards a Uniform Analysis of Any.Robert van Rooij - 2008 - Natural Language Semantics 16 (4):297-315.
Donkey Business.Bart Geurts - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (2):129-156.
Presuppositions for Proportional Quantifiers.Chris Barker - 1996 - Natural Language Semantics 4 (3):237-259.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total views
260 ( #36,210 of 2,445,342 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #35,352 of 2,445,342 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes