Mechanism: A rejoinder

Philosophy 45 (April):149-51 (1970)
Abstract
PROFESSOR LEWIS 1 and Professor Coder 2 criticize my use of Gödel's theorem to refute Mechanism. 3 Their criticisms are valuable. In order to meet them I need to show more clearly both what the tactic of my argument is at one crucial point and the general aim of the whole manoeuvre
Keywords Mechanism  Metaphysics  Coder, D  Goedel  Lewis, D
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819100009815
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,520
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Mental Machinery and Godel.Robert Kirk - 1986 - Synthese 66 (March):437-452.
Lucas Against Mechanism.David Lewis - 1969 - Philosophy 44 (June):231-3.
Lucas Against Mechanism II.David Lewis - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (June):373-6.
Mechanism and Godel's Theorem.William H. Hanson - 1971 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 (February):9-16.
Brains That Think.Roland Puccetti - 1974 - Dialogue 13 (March):99-104.
Lucas Against Mechanism II: A Rejoinder.John R. Lucas - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (June):189-91.
Godel's Theorem and Mechanism.David Coder - 1969 - Philosophy 44 (September):234-7.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
276 ( #12,026 of 2,180,761 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #300,627 of 2,180,761 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums