Economics and Philosophy 13 (2):159-174 (1997)
Many people believe that we have responsibility towards the distant future, but exactly how far this responsibility reaches and how we can find a reasonable ethical foundation for it has not been answered in any definitive manner. Future people have no power over us, they form no part of our moral community and it is unclear how we can represent them in a possible original position. All these problems can be circumvented when you take an impersonal decision criterion like maximizing total or average utility. Such a sum-ranking criterion is neutral with respect to distance in time or space: my utility, my neighbour's and that of our descendants all carry the same weight. This makes future people an integral part of present decisions. Time-neutrality was defended by, among others, Sidgwick, Pigou and Ramsey.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Utilitarianism and Infinite Utility.Peter Vallentyne - 1993 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):212 – 217.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Partially Skeptical Response to Hart and Russell. [REVIEW]Denys A. Turner - 2011 - In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.
Markets, Justice, and the Interests of Future Generations.Clark Wolf - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):153 - 175.
Climate Change and the Rights of Future Generations.William J. FitzPatrick - 2007 - Environmental Ethics 29 (4):369-388.
Conservation, Foresight, and the Future Generations Problem.Steve Vanderheiden - 2006 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (4):337 – 352.
A Note on Motivation and Future Generations.Michael Mackenzie - 1985 - Environmental Ethics 7 (1):63-69.
From What Should We Protect Future Generations: Germ-Line Therapy or Genetic Screening?Pierre Mallia & Henk ten Have - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (1):17-24.
Negative “GHIs,” the Right to Health Protection, and Future Generations.Jan Deckers - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):165-176.
Utilitarianism, Supererogation and Future Generations.R. I. Sikora - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):461 - 466.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads17 ( #285,127 of 2,172,038 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #172,864 of 2,172,038 )
How can I increase my downloads?