The Gödelian Argument: Turn over the Page

Etica E Politica 5 (1):1 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper Lucas suggests that many of his critics have not read carefully neither his exposition nor Penrose’s one, so they seek to refute arguments they never proposed. Therefore he offers a brief history of the Gödelian argument put forward by Gödel, Penrose and Lucas itself: Gödel argued indeed that either mathematics is incompletable – that is axioms can never be comprised in a finite rule and so human mind surpasses the power of any finite machine – or there exist absolutely unsolvable diophantine problems, and he suggest that the second disjunct is untenable; on the other side, Penrose proposed an argument similar to Lucas’ one but making use of Turing’s theorem. Finally Lucas exposes again his argument and considers some of the most important objections to it



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

249 (#54,446)

6 months
43 (#40,869)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references