The Lay-out of Arguments
Arguments have been much misunderstood. Not only has it been assumed that they must be deductive, but it has been assumed also that, although often expressed in loose and elliptical form, they must be capable, if they are valid at all, of being expressed with absolute precision, as a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the action in question to be appropriate. Mathematical arguments are capable of being stated precisely, and it has long been a reproach to workers in other disciplines that they do not manage to achieve equal precision in their work. The assumption is made that absolute precision is in principle available, and it is only a lack of rigour by practitioners in the non-mathematical disciplines that prevents them casting their arguments in satisfactory form, and the philosopher should, therefore, reconstruct arguments to conform with these requirements, evaluating those that do, and rejecting any that do not.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mathematical Arguments in Context.Jean Paul van Bendegem & Bart van Kerkhove - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):45-57.
On the Rationale for Distinguishing Arguments From Explanations.Matthew W. McKeon - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):283-303.
You Would Sing Another Tune.Collin Anderson, Scott Aiken & John Casey - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (1):39-46.
Transcendental Arguments and the Problem of Dogmatism.Oskari Kuusela - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
Equal Pay for Equal Work in the Third World.Hugh Lehman - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (6):487 - 491.
Evaluating Arguments From the Reaction of the Audience.Hugo Mercier & Brent Strickland - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):365 - 378.
Form Vs. Content-Driven Arguments for Realism.Juha Saatsi - 2009 - In P. D. Magnus & Jacob Busch (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Science. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Self-Referential Arguments in Philosophy.Elke Brendel - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):177-197.
Must God Create?Sandra L. Menssen & Thomas D. Sullivan - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):321-341.
Reconceiving Rawls's Arguments for Equal Political Liberty and Its Fair Value.Meena Krishnamurthy - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (2):258-278.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads2 ( #768,271 of 2,168,553 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?