The Lay-out of Arguments

Abstract
Arguments have been much misunderstood. Not only has it been assumed that they must be deductive, but it has been assumed also that, although often expressed in loose and elliptical form, they must be capable, if they are valid at all, of being expressed with absolute precision, as a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the action in question to be appropriate. Mathematical arguments are capable of being stated precisely, and it has long been a reproach to workers in other disciplines that they do not manage to achieve equal precision in their work. The assumption is made that absolute precision is in principle available, and it is only a lack of rigour by practitioners in the non-mathematical disciplines that prevents them casting their arguments in satisfactory form, and the philosopher should, therefore, reconstruct arguments to conform with these requirements, evaluating those that do, and rejecting any that do not.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,590
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Mathematical Arguments in Context.Jean Paul van Bendegem & Bart van Kerkhove - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):45-57.
You Would Sing Another Tune.Collin Anderson, Scott Aiken & John Casey - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (1):39-46.
Transcendental Arguments and the Problem of Dogmatism.Oskari Kuusela - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
Equal Pay for Equal Work in the Third World.Hugh Lehman - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (6):487 - 491.
Argument by Analogy.André Juthe - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):1-27.
Kai Nielsen's Philosophy & Atheism.Hendrik Hart - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):334-346.
The Logic of Real Arguments.Alec Fisher - 2004 - Cambridge Univeristy Press.
Form Vs. Content-Driven Arguments for Realism.Juha Saatsi - 2009 - In P. D. Magnus & Jacob Busch (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Science. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Self-Referential Arguments in Philosophy.Elke Brendel - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):177-197.
Constitutive Arguments.Ariela Tubert - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (8):656-666.
Deductive and Inductive Arguments.Kevin C. Klement - 2003 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Must God Create?Sandra L. Menssen & Thomas D. Sullivan - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):321-341.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-22

Total downloads

2 ( #768,271 of 2,168,553 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

0

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums