The second epistemic way revisited: Reply to professor beard's, 'professor Lucas on omniscience' [Book Review]

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1003063324673
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Vegetarianism, Morality, and Science Revisited.Evelyn Pluhar - 1994 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (1):77-82.
On Professor White's Puzzle.Robert W. Beard - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (1):107-109.
Minds, Machines and Godel: A Reply to Mr Lucas.C. Whitely - 1962 - Philosophy 37 (January):61-62.
The Second Epistemic Way.Billy Joe Lucas - 1985 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 18 (3):107 - 114.
Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne.Phillip Cole - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
Professor Lucas' Second Epistemic Way.Alexander R. Pruss - 1999 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 45 (3):189-194.
Professor Lucas on Omniscience.Robert W. Beard - 1986 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 20 (1):37 - 43.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
17 ( #291,072 of 2,193,216 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,278 of 2,193,216 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature