Interpreted logical forms, belief attribution, and the dynamic lexicon

In K. Jaczszolt (ed.), The Pragmatics of Propositional Attitudes. Elsevier (2000)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,113
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Davidson's Program and Interpreted Logical Forms.Lenny Clapp - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (3):261-297.
Moral Belief Attribution: A Reply to Roskies.Michael Cholbi - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (5):629 – 638.
Interpreted Logical Forms as Objects of the Attitudes.M. Dusche - 1995 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (4):301-315.
Interpreted Logical Forms: A Critique.Robert Fiengo & Robert May - 1996 - Rivista Di Linguistica 8 (2):349-373.
Interpreted Logical Forms.Richard K. Larson & Peter Ludlow - 1993 - Synthese 95 (3):305 - 355.
Interpreted Logical Forms and Knowing Your Own Mind.Jim Edwards - 1999 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (2):169-90.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-04-06

Total views
1 ( #1,144,126 of 2,313,478 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #565,222 of 2,313,478 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature