Current Anthropology 59 (4):415-438 (2018)

David Ludwig
Wageningen University and Research
Ethnobiology has a long tradition of metaphysical debates about the “naturalness,” “objectivity”, “reality”, and “universality” of classifications. Especially the work of Brent Berlin has been influential in developing a “convergence metaphysics” that explains cross-cultural similarities of knowledge systems through shared recognition of objective discontinuities in nature. Despite its influence on the development of the field, convergence metaphysics has largely fallen out of favor as contemporary ethnobiologists tend to emphasize the locality and diversity of classificatory practices. The aim of this article is twofold: First, I provide a historical account of the rise and fall of convergence metaphysics in ethnobiology. I show how convergence metaphysics emerged as an innovative theoretical program in the wake of the “cognitive revolution” and the “modern evolutionary synthesis” but failed to incorporate both theoretical insights and political concerns that gained prominence in the 1980s and 1990s. Second, I develop a positive proposal of how to engage with metaphysical issues in ethnobiology. By integrating traditional research on convergence of classifications with more nuanced accounts of distinctly local categories, a revamped metaphysics of ethnobiological classification can make substantial contributions to debates about ontological difference in anthropology and about the relation between applied and theoretical ethnobiology.
Keywords Ontological Turn  Ethnobiology  Traditional Ecological Knowledge  Anthropological Theory  Classification  Natural Kinds  Ethnoecology  Taxonomy  Cultural Relativism  Ontology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ways of Worldmaking.Nelson Goodman - 1978 - Harvester Press.
Natural Kindness.Matthew Slater - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):375-411.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Does Cognition Still Matter in Ethnobiology?David Ludwig - 2018 - Ethnobiology Letters 9 (2):269-275.
Representing and Coordinating Ethnobiological Knowledge.Daniel Weiskopf - forthcoming - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Indigenous and Scientific Kinds.David Ludwig - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (1).
Against the New Metaphysics of Race.David Ludwig - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (2):244-265.
Levels of Reality and Levels of Representation.Claudio Gnoli & Roberto Poli - 2004 - Knowledge Organization 31 (3):151-160.
Le naturel est artificiel : l’héritage de la scientia scientiarum.Hope A. Olson, Jihee Beak & Inkyung Choi - 2013 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 66 (2):, [ p.].
Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics.Tuomas E. Tahko (ed.) - 2011 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scientific Kinds.Marc Ereshefsky & Thomas A. C. Reydon - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (4):969-986.


Added to PP index

Total views
255 ( #29,125 of 2,325,396 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #8,831 of 2,325,396 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes