Exposition and Obligation: A Serresian Account of Moral Sensitivity

Symposium 18 (1):176-193 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In The Troubadour of Knowledge, Michel Serres demonstrates, by means of an extended discussion of learning, that our capacity to adopt a position presupposes a kind of disorienting exposure to a dimension of pure possibility that both subtends and destabilizes that position. In this paper I trace out the implications of this insight for our understanding of obligation, especially as it is articulated in the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Specifically, I argue that obligation is given along with a dimension of moral possibility, and not, as Kant thought, as an unmediated fact of reason.

Similar books and articles

Law's Halo.Donald H. Regan - 1986 - Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1):15.
A Fact, As It Were: Obligation, Indifference, and the Question of Ethics.Bryan Lueck - 2016 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1):219-234.
Semantic and Moral Luck.Axel Arturo Barceló Aspeitia - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (3):204-220.
Military service and moral obligation.Hugo Adam Bedau - 1971 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):244 – 266.
A Problem for Harman’s Moral Relativism.William L. Langenfus - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:121-136.
Normativity and reason.Thomas Pink - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):406-431.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
289 (#67,466)

6 months
91 (#45,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bryan Lueck
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references