Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 41 (3):246-260 (2010)
AbstractOne of the dominant themes structuring the trajectory of Jean-François Lyotard's philosophical work is his concern to think the event in a way that renders it intelligible, but that also respects the alterity and the uncanniness that are essential to it. In this paper I defend Lyotard's earlier understanding of the event, articulated most thoroughly in Discours, figure, from the criticisms of the later Lyotard, articulated most thoroughly in The Differend. More specifically, I attempt to demonstrate that the event, as disruption of the stable system of signification, is given immediately with the signification that it disrupts.
Similar books and articles
Discourse, Figure by Jean-François Lyotard (Review).Jason Helms - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (1):122-130.
The Politics of Jean-François Lyotard: Justice and Political Theory.Chris Rojek, Bryan S. Turner & Jean-François Lyotard (eds.) - 1998 - Routledge.
Lyotard and the Christian Metanarrative: A Rejoinder to Smith and Westphal.Justin Thacker - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):301-315.
La Figure Dans le Discours Géométrique: Les Façonnages d'Un Style.Jean Dhombres - 1993 - Theoria 8 (1):51-88.
Irigaray and Lyotard: Birth, Infancy, and Metaphysics.Rachel Jones - 2012 - Hypatia 27 (1):139-162.
The Philosophical Politics of Jean-Franqois Lyotard.Tim Jordan - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (3):267-285.
Standpoint Theory and the Possibility of Justice: A Lyotardian Critique of the Democratization of Knowledge.Margret Grebowicz - 2007 - Hypatia 22 (4):16-29.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.