Consciousness and Cognition 18 (3):766-772 (2009)

Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of communicative intention on action. In Experiment 1 participants were requested to reach towards an object, grasp it, and either simply lift it or lift it with the intent to communicate a meaning to a partner . Movement kinematics were recorded using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. The results indicate that kinematics was sensitive to communicative intention. Although the to-be-grasped object remained the same, movements performed for the ‘communicative’ condition were characterized by a kinematic pattern which differed from those obtained for the ‘individual’ condition. These findings were confirmed in a subsequent experiment in which the communicative condition was compared to a control condition, in which the communicative exchange was prevented. Results are discussed in terms of cognitive pragmatics and current knowledge on how social behavior shapes action kinematics
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2009.06.004
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,261
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How Action Governs Intention.Nishi Shah - 2008 - Philosophers' Imprint 8:1-19.
John Searle.Joshua Rust - 2009 - Continuum.
Ambiguity of "Intention".Thomas M. Scanlon - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):348-349.
Intention and Motivational Strength.Hugh Mccann - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:571-583.
Affect, Goals, and Movement. Affect and Action Control.Deidre L. Reis & Jeremy R. Gray - 2009 - In Ezequiel Morsella, John A. Bargh & Peter M. Gollwitzer (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Human Action. Oxford University Press.
What Are Intentions?Elisabeth Pacherie & Patrick Haggard - 2010 - In L. Nadel & W. Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.), Conscious Will and Responsibility. A tribute to Benjamin Libet. Oxford University Press. pp. 70--84.
Interpersonal Practical Reasoning.Myles Brand - 1987 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 30 (1):77-95.
Intention and Motor Representation in Purposive Action.Stephen Andrew Butterfill & Corrado Sinigaglia - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):119-145.
The Intentionality of Intention and Action.John R. Searle - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):253 – 280.
Knowledge of Intention.Kieran Setiya - 2011 - In Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby & Frederick Stoutland (eds.), Essays on Anscombe's Intention. Harvard University Press. pp. 170--197.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
49 ( #220,010 of 2,455,858 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,201 of 2,455,858 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes