Foundations of Science (2):1-27 (2020)

Robert Luk
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
It is relatively easy to state that information retrieval is a scientific discipline but it is rather difficult to understand why it is science because what is science is still under debate in the philosophy of science. To be able to convince others that IR is science, our ability to explain why is crucial. To explain why IR is a scientific discipline, we use a theory and a model of scientific study, which were proposed recently. The explanation involves mapping the knowledge structure of IR to that of well-known scientific disciplines like physics. In addition, the explanation involves identifying the common aim, principles and assumptions in IR and in well-known scientific disciplines like physics, so that they constrain the scientific investigation in IR in a similar way as in physics. Therefore, there are strong similarities in terms of the knowledge structure and the constraints of the scientific investigations between IR and scientific disciplines like physics. Based on such similarities, IR is considered a scientific discipline.
Keywords Science  Correspondence  Similarity  Physics  Information Retrieval
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10699-020-09685-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
What Is This Thing Called Science?A. F. Chalmers - 1979 - Erkenntnis 14 (3):393-404.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Insights in How Computer Science Can Be a Science.Robert W. P. Luk - 2020 - Science and Philosophy 8 (2):17-46.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Theory of Scientific Study.Robert Luk - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (1):11-38.
The Problem of Assimilation of Scientific Information.A. K. Sukhotin - 1973 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):54-72.
The Structure of Scientific Theories.Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Aristotle on Kind‐Crossing.Philipp Steinkrüger - 2018 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 54:107-158.
Some Problems in the Logic of Scientific Knowledge.P. V. Tavanets & V. S. Shvyrev - 1962 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 1 (3):33-41.
Causal Warrant for Realism About Particle Physics.Matthias Egg - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):259-280.
Historical Contingency and the Impact of Scientific Imperialism.Ian James Kidd - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):317–326.
The Tracing to the Historical Source of Philosophy of Scientific Culture.Zengni Jin & Hongwei Li - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 47:89-91.


Added to PP index

Total views
21 ( #534,534 of 2,506,369 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #140,084 of 2,506,369 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes