Human Studies 23 (3):227-241 (2000)

Simon Lumsden
University of New South Wales
In Totality and Infinity Levinas presents the 'face to face' as an account of intersubjectivity, but one which maintains the absolute difference of the Other. This essay explores the genesis of the 'face to face' through a discussion of Levinas in relation to Buber. It is argued that Levinas' account of subjectivity shares much in common with Fichte's theory of subjectivity. It is further argued that while the 'face to face' clarifies and opposes traditional problems in social ontology, the 'face to face' is unable to avoid the traditional problems of social ontology that it seeks to avoid
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Modern Philosophy   Philosophy of the Social Sciences   Political Philosophy   Sociolinguistics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1005628507987
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Totality and Infinity.Emmanuel Levinas - 1961/1969 - Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
I and Thou.Martin Buber - 1958 - New York: Scribner.
Hegel's Hermeneutics.Paul Redding - 2020 - Cornell University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Education and the Face of the Other: Levinas, Camus and (Mis)Understanding.Peter Roberts - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (11):1133-1149.
Being Other: Intersubjectivity, Allocentrism and the Possible.Vlad Petre Glaveanu - 2019 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 49 (4):443-459.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
72 ( #159,797 of 2,505,456 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,579 of 2,505,456 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes