Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation

Informal Logic 44 (1):574-600 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses Harvey Siegel’s general justification of the epistemological theory of argumentation in his seminal essay “Arguing with Arguments." On the one hand, the achievements of this essay are honoured—in particular, a thorough differentiation of the different meanings of ‘argument’ and ‘argumentation,’ the semantic justification of the fundamentality of arguments as sequences of propositions, and the detailed critiques of alternative theories of argumentation. On the other hand, suggestions for strengthening the theory are added to Siegel's expositions, which make different perspectives within the epistemological theory of argumentation recognisable.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-16

Downloads
123 (#151,060)

6 months
123 (#36,292)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christoph Lumer
University Of Siena

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references