Pragma-Dialectics and the Function of Argumentation

Argumentation 24 (1):41-69 (2010)

Authors
Christoph Lumer
University Of Siena
Abstract
This contribution discusses some problems of Pragma-Dialectics and explains them by its consensualistic view of the function of argumentation and by its philosophical underpinnings. It is suggested that these problems can be overcome by relying on a better epistemology and on an epistemological theory of argumentation. On the one hand Pragma-Dialectics takes unqualified consensus as the aim of argumentation, which is problematic, (Sect. 2) on the other it includes strong epistemological and rationalistic elements (Sect. 3). The problematic philosophical underpinnings of Pragma-Dialectics, specifically Critical Rationalism as well as Logical Constructivism and Dialogic Logic of the Erlangen School, are among the sources of this incoherence (Sect. 4). A detailed critique of the Pragma-Dialectical discussion rules shows the negative consequences of this foundation and indicates how they could be avoided (Sects. 5, 6)
Keywords Pragma-Dialectics  Function of argumentation  Consensualism  Unqualified consensus  Epistemological theory of argumentation  Epistemological rationality  Discussion rules  Dialogic Logic  Logical Constructivism  Erlangen School  Münchhausen-Trilemma  Externalization
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-008-9118-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,951
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge in a Social World.Alvin I. Goldman - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Manifest Rationality.Ralph Johnson - 2000 - Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Vale Press.
Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:492-492.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pragma-Dialectics and Beyond.Daniel Bonevac - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):451-459.
Deductivism Within Pragma-Dialectics.Leo Groarke - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):1-16.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-21

Total views
43 ( #178,514 of 2,235,503 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #146,058 of 2,235,503 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature