Hobbes on Opinion, Private Judgment and Civil War

History of Political Thought 13 (1):51 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The precise relationship between Hobbes's political philosophy and his late history of the English Civil War remains something of a puzzle. Given his well known doubts about the epistemological status of history, Behemoth or the Long Parliament is often treated as little more than a procrustean effort at forcing complex historical events into the bed of abstract theory that he had developed earlier. On this view, even Noam Flinker, who offers one of the few studies devoted to a close reading of Behemoth, argues that Hobbes intended the work to be self repudiating, and that the dialogue form and the apparent confusions of one of the participants were meant to point readers to �the less rhetorical logic of the Leviathan�. Others, more impressed by Hobbes�s pragmatic intentions than his methodological pretensions, note that a primary motive for his political arguments was a horror at first of the prospect and then of the reality of civil war. They thus emphasize the significance of Behemoth for Hobbes and his interpreters. Robert Kraynak, for example, argues that it �is a work of primary importance� in completing the �history of civilization which is the logical beginning point of Hobbes's thought�, and that a complete understanding of his political theory is impossible without his analysis of the way in which �doctrinal politics and disputative science� had created political chaos in England. This interpretation correctly emphasizes the role of ideas, as opposed to economic interests, in his explanation of civil conflict. It also rightly notes didactic continuities between Behemoth and his earlier work. However, I argue below that it overestimates the extent to which Hobbes treats the general idea of opinion as an eliminable product of �artificial� historical relations rather than as a permanent feature of human psychology and action. Thus, it discounts the extent to which his understanding of the relationship between opinion and civil war was a product of his philosophy rather than of a 'history of civilization'

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes.Jeffrey R. Collins - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Odi et Amo? Hobbes on the State of Nature.Andrés Rosler - 2011 - Hobbes Studies 24 (1):91-111.
Hobbes.Aloysius Martinich - 1989 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1):636-637.
Hobbes: Moral and Political Philosophy.Garrath Williams - 2003 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Scepticism and pluralism in Thomas Hobbes's political thought.A. Lister - 1998 - History of Political Thought 19 (1):35-60.
Divine law and human law in Hobbes's Leviathan.Greg Forster - 2003 - History of Political Thought 24 (2):189-217.
Hobbes and the civil law : the use of Roman law in Hobbes's civil science.Daniel Lee - 2012 - In David Dyzenhaus & Thomas Poole (eds.), Hobbes and the Law. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas hobbess theory of conscience.Mark Hanin - 2012 - History of Political Thought 33 (1):55-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
25 (#542,984)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Hobbes's genealogy of private conscience.Guido Frilli - 2020 - European Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):755-769.
Hobbes e a questão da dissolução e manutenção do Estado.Cláudio Roberto Leivas - 2011 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 10 (2):323-340.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references