Digital companion species and eating data: Implications for theorising digital data–human assemblages

Big Data and Society 3 (1) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary is an attempt to begin to identify and think through some of the ways in which sociocultural theory may contribute to understandings of the relationship between humans and digital data. I develop an argument that rests largely on the work of two scholars in the field of science and technology studies: Donna Haraway and Annemarie Mol. Both authors emphasised materiality and multiple ontologies in their writing. I argue that these concepts have much to offer critical data studies. I employ the tropes of companion species, drawn from Haraway, and eating data, from Mol, and demonstrate how these may be employed to theorise digital data–human assemblages.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Digital Phenotype: a Philosophical and Ethical Exploration.Michele Loi - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (1):155-171.
The Digital Subject: People as Data as Persons.Olga Goriunova - 2019 - Theory, Culture and Society 36 (6):125-145.
Big Data in food and agriculture.Irena Knezevic & Kelly Bronson - 2016 - Big Data and Society 3 (1).
Data Motility: The Materiality of Big Social Data.Mark Coté - 2014 - Cultural Studies Review 20 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-24

Downloads
59 (#267,103)

6 months
52 (#80,128)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?