Mortal harm

Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):239–251 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The harm thesis says that death may harm the individual who dies. The posthumous harm thesis says that posthumous events may harm those who die. Epicurus rejects both theses, claiming that there is no subject who is harmed, no clear harm which is received, and no clear time when any harm is received. Feldman rescues the harm thesis with solutions to Epicurus' three puzzles based on his own version of the deprivation account of harm. But many critics, among them Lamont, Grey, Feit and Bradley, have rejected Feldman's solution to the timing puzzle, offering their own solutions in its place. I discuss these solutions to the timing puzzle, and defend the view that while we are alive we may incur harm for which death and posthumous events are responsible

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Metaphysics of Death.John Martin Fischer (ed.) - 1993 - Stanford University Press.
Death's Distinctive Harm.Stephan Blatti - 2012 - American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):317-30.
Harming the Dead.James Stacey Taylor - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:185-202.
Desire Fulfillment and Posthumous Harm.Douglas W. Portmore - 2007 - American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):27 - 38.
The Harm Principle.Nils Holtug - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
The Moral Status of Enabling Harm.Samuel C. Rickless - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):66-86.
Posthumous Harm.Steven Luper - 2004 - American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (1):63 - 72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
177 (#70,240)

6 months
6 (#123,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven Luper
Trinity University

Citations of this work

Comparative Harm, Creation and Death.Neil Feit - 2016 - Utilitas 28 (2):136-163.
Value After Death.Christopher Frugé - 2022 - Ratio 35 (3):194-203.
Accounting for the Harm of Death.Duncan Purves - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1):89-112.
Desire Satisfaction, Death, and Time.Duncan Purves - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (6):799-819.
Permanent Value.Christopher Frugé - 2022 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 8 (2):356-372.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Death.Thomas Nagel - 1970 - Noûs 4 (1):73-80.
Some Puzzles About the Evil of Death.Fred Feldman - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (2):205-227.
The Misfortunes of the Dead.George Pitcher - 1984 - American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (2):183 - 188.
The Evil of Death.Harry S. Silverstein - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (7):401-424.

View all 15 references / Add more references