Mindreading Animals: The Debate Over What Animals Know About Other Minds

Bradford (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

But do animals know that other creatures have minds? And how would we know if they do? In "Mindreading Animals," Robert Lurz offers a fresh approach to the hotly debated question of mental-state attribution in nonhuman animals.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,528

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Phenomenology and the Problem of Animal Minds.Simon P. James - 2009 - Environmental Values 18 (1):33 - 49.
Animal minds: a non-representationalist approach.Hans Johann Https://Orcidorg909X Glock - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):213-232.
Animals and Sociology.Kay Peggs - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Animal Minds: A Non-Representationalist Approach.Hans-Johann Glock - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):213-232.
Personhood and Animals.Elisa Aaltola - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (2):175-193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-06

Downloads
58 (#244,758)

6 months
9 (#142,617)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Lurz
Brooklyn College

Citations of this work

Agency and Moral Status.Jeff Sebo - 2017 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 14 (1):1-22.
Morgan’s Quaker gun and the species of belief.Devin Sanchez Curry - 2023 - Philosophical Perspectives 37 (1):119-144.
Origins of Meaning: Must We ‘Go Gricean’?Dorit Bar-on - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (3):342-375.

View all 47 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references