The sheer multitude of criteria of empirical significance has been taken as evidence that the pre-analytic notion being explicated is too vague to be useful. I show instead that a significant number of these criteria—by Ayer, Popper, Przełęcki, Suppes, and David Lewis, among others—not only form a coherent whole, but also connect directly to the theory of definition, the notion of empirical content as explicated by Ramsey sentences, and the theory of measurement; two criteria by Carnap and Sober are trivial, but can be saved and connected to the other criteria by slight modifications. A corollary is that the ordinary language defense of Lewis, the conceptual arguments by Ayer and Popper, the theoretical considerations by Przełęcki, and the practical considerations by Suppes all apply to the same criterion or closely related criteria. Furthermore, the equivalence of some criteria allows for their individual justifications to be taken cumulatively and, together with the entailment relations between nonequivalent criteria, suggest criteria for general auxiliary assumptions, comparative criteria, and more liberal conceptions of observation
|Keywords||empirical significance cognitive significance meaningfulness testability falsifiability verifiability empirical content cognitive content|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Criteria of Empirical Significance: Foundations, Relations, Applications.Sebastian Lutz - 2012 - Dissertation, Utrecht University
The Simplicity of Theories: Its Degree and Form. [REVIEW]James W. McAllister - 1991 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (1):1-14.
Criteria for the Design and Evaluation of Cognitive Architectures.Sashank Varma - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (7):1329-1351.
McAllister's Aesthetics in Science: A Critical Notice.David Davies - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):25 – 32.
Empirical Certainty and the Theory of Important Criteria.Michael Anthony Slote - 1967 - Inquiry 10 (1-4):21 – 37.
Prediction, Explanation, and Testability as Criteria for Judging Statistical Theories.Brown Grier - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (4):373-383.
Moral Psychology and the Problem of Moral Criteria.Patrick Welch - 2011 - Journal of Moral Education 40 (4):513-526.
The Holy Grail of Cognitivism: A Response to Adams and Aizawa. [REVIEW]Richard Menary - 2010 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (4):605-618.
The Significance of Re-Doing Experiments: A Contribution to Historically Informed Methodology. [REVIEW]Jutta Schickore - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (3):325-347.
Approaching Descriptive and Theoretical Truth.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 1982 - Erkenntnis 18 (3):343 - 378.
Semantical Criteria of Empirical Meaningfulness.Ryszard Wójcicki - 1966 - Studia Logica 19 (1):75 - 109.
An Analysis of the Criteria for Evaluating Adequate Theories of Computation.Nir Fresco - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (3):379-401.
Added to index2010-12-14
Total downloads83 ( #60,959 of 2,152,226 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #185,125 of 2,152,226 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.