Synthese 194 (1):217-252 (2017)

Authors
Sebastian Lutz
Uppsala University
Abstract
Carnap’s search for a criterion of empirical significance is usually considered a failure. I argue that the results from two out of his three different approaches are at the very least problematic, but that one approach led to success. Carnap’s criterion of translatability into logical syntax is too vague to allow for definite results. His criteria for terms—introducibility by chains of reduction sentences and his criterion from “The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts”—are almost trivial and have no clear relation to the empirical significance of sentences. However, his criteria for sentences—translatability, verifiability, falsifiability, confirmability—are usable, and under the assumptions needed for the Carnap sentence approach, verifiability, falsifiability, and translatability become equivalent. As a result of the Carnap sentence approach, metaphysics is rendered analytic.
Keywords Empirical significance  Carnap   Logical empiricism  Carnap sentence  Verifiability  Falsifiability
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11229-014-0561-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Harvard University Press.
Logical Foundations of Probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Language, Truth and Logic.Alfred Jules Ayer - 1936 - London: V. Gollancz.

View all 88 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Armchair Philosophy Naturalized.Sebastian Lutz - 2020 - Synthese 197 (3):1099-1125.
Verificationism and (Some of) its Discontents.Thomas Uebel - 2019 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 7 (4):1-31.
Vienna Circle.Thomas Uebel - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Relevance and Verification.Ben Blumson - 2021 - Philosophical Quarterly 71 (3):457-480.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Kaplan on Carnap on Significance.Richard Creath - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 30 (6):393 - 400.
Empirical Equivalence in the Quine-Carnap Debate.Eric J. Loomis - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.
Carnaps Logische Analyse En Eliminatie Van de Metafysica.M. Perrick - 1988 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 50 (3):492 - 507.
Carnap, the Principle of Tolerance, and Empiricism.Robert Hudson - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (3):341-358.
A Reserved Reading of Carnap's Aufbau.Christopher Pincock - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):518–543.
Stroud’s Carnap.Marc Alspector-Kelly - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):276-302.
Carnap's Logical Structure of the World.Chris Pincock - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):951-961.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-01

Total views
197 ( #59,050 of 2,505,228 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #63,771 of 2,505,228 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes