Justifying Idealization by Abstraction


I show how omissions lead to robustness and can justify distortions, and I give inferentially relevant explications of abstraction and idealization. Abstraction is explicated as the omission of all and only those claims that use a specific vocabulary; idealization is explicated as the distortion of only those claims that use a specific vocabulary. With these explications, abstraction can justify idealization. As examples of how abstraction justifies idealization and leads to robustness, I discuss Beauchamp and Childress's four principles of biomedical ethics and the qualitative treatment of the Schrödinger equation.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,271

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Between abstraction and idealization: Scientific practice and philosophical awareness.Francesco Coniglione - 2004 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):59-110.
Idealization and abstraction: A framework.Martin R. Jones - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 86 (1):173-218.
Pragmatic idealization and structuralist reconstructions of theories.Michaela Haase - 1996 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 27 (2):215-234.
What Is an Isolated System?Lawrence Sklar - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:51-57.


Added to PP

8 (#1,264,457)

6 months
1 (#1,499,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sebastian Lutz
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references