The Triple Confusion of Utopia

Diogenes 53 (1):5-10 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The problem with utopia is that it lends itself to a form of idolatry which creates a confusion between the order of values sought and the historical event. In trying at all costs to become reality in the here and now, the dream turns into a nightmare. The confusion is threefold: confusion between the utopian objective aimed at but not yet realized and the end situation resulting from an action; confusion between the imaginary representation of an order of values and a particular social situation; and finally confusion between the rule of conduct and a mandate to bring about the ideal society no matter what the odds. So utopia, transformed into an ideology, leads to a frightening mode of thought: justification of absolute power in pursuit of the supreme good

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”.Chris MacDonald - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):243-262.
In Search of a New Utopia.Galib A. Khan - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:269-273.
Pragmatism, utopia and anti-utopia.Ruth Levitas - 2008 - Critical Horizons 9 (1):42-59.
Intermingling and confusion.Katherine J. Morris - 1995 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):290 – 306.
La triple confusion de l'utopie.Luis Villoro - 2005 - Diogène 209 (1):3-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
43 (#362,182)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references