Argumentative Skills: A Systematic Framework for Teaching and Learning

Journal of Didactics of Philosophy 5 (2):72-100 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a framework for fostering argumentative skills in a systematic way in Philosophy and Ethics classes. We start with a review of curricula and teaching materials from the German-speaking world to show that there is an urgent need for standards for the teaching and learning of argumentation. Against this backdrop, we present a framework for such standards that is intended to tackle these difficulties. The spiral-curricular model of argumentative competences we sketch helps teachers introduce the relevant concepts and skills to students early on in their school career. The focus is on secondary schools, but the proposal can also be of use for learning and teaching in universities, especially in introductory classes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-01

Downloads
890 (#19,684)

6 months
389 (#5,200)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Donata Romizi
University of Vienna
David Löwenstein
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
1 more

References found in this work

Making it Explicit.Isaac Levi & Robert B. Brandom - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):145.
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Christopher Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.
Intellectual Autobiography.Rudolf Carnap - 1963 - In Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, Ill.,: Open Court. pp. 3--84.
The Nature and Future of Philosophy.Michael Dummett - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references