Argumentative Skills: A Systematic Framework for Teaching and Learning

Journal of Didactics of Philosophy 5 (2):72-100 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, we propose a framework for fostering argumentative skills in a systematic way in Philosophy and Ethics classes. We start with a review of curricula and teaching materials from the German-speaking world to show that there is an urgent need for standards for the teaching and learning of argumentation. Against this backdrop, we present a framework for such standards that is intended to tackle these difficulties. The spiral-curricular model of argumentative competences we sketch helps teachers introduce the relevant concepts and skills to students early on in their school career. The focus is on secondary schools, but the proposal can also be of use for learning and teaching in universities, especially in introductory classes.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Four-Sentence Paper.Dennis Earl - 2015 - Teaching Philosophy 38 (1):49-76.
Ethical issues in teaching.Michael Cholbi - 2013 - International Encyclopedia of Ethics.
Teaching for Argumentative Thought.Shelagh Crooks - 2009 - Teaching Philosophy 32 (3):247-261.
Embedding Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in a Philosophy Course.Julie Loveland Swanstrom - 2018 - American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy 4:78-99.
The Role of Educational Technology in the ESL Classroom.Md Ruhhul Amin - 2019 - Global Journal of Archaeology and Anthropology 11 (1):1-11.
Science education for citizenship: teaching socio-scientific issues.Mary Ratcliffe - 2003 - Philadelphia: Open University Press. Edited by Marcus Grace.


Added to PP

392 (#36,288)

6 months
76 (#22,655)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Donata Romizi
University of Vienna
David Löwenstein
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
1 more

References found in this work

Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Christopher Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.
The Aporetic Structure of Philosophical Problems.Wolfgang Barz - 2019 - Journal of Didactics of Philosophy 3 ((1)):5-18.
Analoge Argumente und Analogieargumente.David Löwenstein - 2015 - In Anna Wehofsits, David Löwenstein, Dirk Koppelberg & Gregor Betz (eds.), Weiter Denken - Über Philosophie, Wissenschaft Und Religion. De Gruyter. pp. 105-124.

View all 7 references / Add more references