Utilitas 18 (1):1-19 (2006)
When Amartya Sen defends his capability theory of well-being he contrasts it with the utility theory advocated by the classical utilitarians, including John Stuart Mill. Yet a closer examination of the two theories reveals that they are much more similar than they appear. Each theory can be interpreted in either a subjective or an objective way. When both are interpreted subjectively the differences between them are slight, and likewise for the objective interpretations. Finally, whatever differences may remain are less important than they might seem, since the two theories are developed by Sen and Mill for different purposes and are in that sense not genuine rivals.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
An Agency‐Based Capability Theory of Justice.Rutger Claassen - 2016 - European Journal of Philosophy 24 (4).
Similar books and articles
Capability, Happiness and Adaptation in Sen and J. S. Mill.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2006 - Utilitas 18 (1):20-32.
Critical Capability Pedagogies and University Education.Melanie Walker - 2010 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (8):898-917.
Social Choice and Individual Capabilities.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):169-192.
Gender, Discrimination, and Capability: Insights From Amartya Sen.Douglas A. Hicks - 2002 - Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (1):137 - 154.
Endorsement and Freedom in Amartya Sen's Capability Approach.Serena Olsaretti - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):89-108.
Resources Versus Capabilities: Social Endowments in Egalitarian Theory.Rolans Pierik & Robeyns Ingrid - 2007 - Political Studies 55 (1):133.
Capabilities, Resources, and Systematic Injustice: A Case of Gender Inequality.Jude Browne & Marc Stears - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):355-373.
Reparations for Luck Egalitarians.Roland Pierik - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3):423–440.
Expected Utility and Constrained Maximization: Problems of Compatibility. [REVIEW]Hans Lottenbach - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (1):37 - 48.
Distributive Justice and Basic Capability Equality: 'Good Enough' is Not Good Enough.Richard J. Arneson - unknown
A Capability Approach to Justice as a Virtue.Jay Drydyk - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):23-38.
Hume and Mill on 'Utility of Religion': A Borgean Garden of Forking Paths?José L. Tasset - 2007 - Τέλος. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas 14 (2):117-129.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads164 ( #28,360 of 2,172,879 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #75,737 of 2,172,879 )
How can I increase my downloads?