The Ethics of Aggregation and Hormone Replacement Therapy

Health Care Analysis 9 (2):187-211 (2001)

Abstract
The use of aggregated quality of life estimatesin the formation of public policy and practiceguidelines raises concerns about the moralrelevance of variability in values inpreferences for health care. This variabilitymay reflect unique and deeply held beliefs thatmay be lost when averaged with the preferencesof other individuals. Feminist moral theorieswhich argue for attention to context andparticularity underline the importance ofascertaining the extent to which differences inpreferences for health states revealinformation which is morally relevant toclinicians and policymakers. To facilitatethese considerations, we present an empiricalstudy of preferences for the timing andoccurrence of health states associated withhormone replacement therapy (HRT). Sixteenwomen between the ages of 45 and 55 wereenrolled in this pilot study. Theirpreferences regarding five health statesassociated with HRT (menopausal symptoms, sideeffects of HRT, breast cancer, myocardialinfarction, and osteoporosis) were assessed inquantitative terms known as utilities. Twostandard methods, the visual analog scale (VAS) and the standard gamble (SG), were used toassess utility and time preference (calculatedas a discount rate). The wide variability ofresponses underlines the importance oftailoring health care to individual women'spreferences. Policy guidelines whichincorporate utility analysis must recognize thenormative limitations of aggregatedpreferences, and the moral relevance ofindividual conceptions of health
Keywords cost-effective analysis  decision analysis  distributive justice  feminist theory  hormone replacement therapy  menopause  patient preferences  time preference  utility  women
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1011386320609
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,283
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Corporate Moral Responsibility in Health Care.Stephen Wilmot - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (2):139-146.
Should We Create a Health Care System in the United States?Laurence B. McCullough - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):483-490.
Why 'Health' is Not a Central Category for Public Health Policy.Stephen John - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):129-143.
Does It Really Care? The Harvard Report on Health Care Reform for Hong Kong.Julia Tao Lai Po-wah - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):571 – 590.
Social Justice and Equal Access to Health Care.Gene Outka - 1974 - Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (1):11 - 32.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total views
33 ( #270,853 of 2,279,965 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #828,945 of 2,279,965 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature