Allan Franklin's Transcendental Physics

Abstract
This paper was presented at a session on "Three views of experiment: Atomic parity violations," in which Allan Franklin's study of an episode in the recent history of particle physics was discussed and criticized. Franklin argues in favor of what he calls "the evidence model," a general claim to the effect that physicists' theory choices are based on valid experimental evidence. He contrasts his position to that of the social constructivists, who, according to him, insist that social and cognitive interests, and not the evidence, explains physicists' practical and theoretical judgments. My paper argues that Franklin miscasts the debate between experimental realism and social constructivism, because constructivists do not insist that evidence has no role whatsoever in experimental practice. My position draws lessons from Wittgenstein's later philosophy and ethnomethodological studies of scientific practices. The paper does not aim to support social constructivism against Franklin's arguments, so much as to suggest that the terms of the realist-constructivist debate provide a poor context for the examination of the temporal production of experiments and observations.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,178
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
How to Avoid the Experimenters' Regress.Allan Franklin - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (3):463-491.
The Experimenters' Regress: From Skepticism to Argumentation.B. Godin & Y. Gingras - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):133-148.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Reason Enough? More on Parity-Violation Experiments and Electroweak Gauge Theory.Andy Pickering - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:459 - 469.
Allan Franklin, Right or Wrong.Robert Ackermann - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:451-457.
Fisica y Experimentacion.Allan Franklin - 2002 - Theoria 17 (2):221-242.
Franklin, Holmes, and the Epistemology of Computer Simulation.Wendy S. Parker - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):165 – 183.
Do Mutants Have to Be Slain, or Do They Die of Natural Causes?: The Case of Atomic Parity Violation Experiments.Allan Franklin - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:487 - 494.
Experiment and the Development of the Theory of Weak Interactions: Fermi's Theory.Allan Franklin - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:163 - 179.
Maher, Mendeleev and Bayesianism.Colin Howson & Allan Franklin - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (4):574-585.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-29

Total downloads

4 ( #638,977 of 2,163,682 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,682 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums