PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:471 - 485 (1990)
This paper was presented at a session on "Three views of experiment: Atomic parity violations," in which Allan Franklin's study of an episode in the recent history of particle physics was discussed and criticized. Franklin argues in favor of what he calls "the evidence model," a general claim to the effect that physicists' theory choices are based on valid experimental evidence. He contrasts his position to that of the social constructivists, who, according to him, insist that social and cognitive interests, and not the evidence, explains physicists' practical and theoretical judgments. My paper argues that Franklin miscasts the debate between experimental realism and social constructivism, because constructivists do not insist that evidence has no role whatsoever in experimental practice. My position draws lessons from Wittgenstein's later philosophy and ethnomethodological studies of scientific practices. The paper does not aim to support social constructivism against Franklin's arguments, so much as to suggest that the terms of the realist-constructivist debate provide a poor context for the examination of the temporal production of experiments and observations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
How to Avoid the Experimenters' Regress.Allan Franklin - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (3):463-491.
The Experimenters' Regress: From Skepticism to Argumentation.B. Godin & Y. Gingras - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):133-148.
Similar books and articles
Reason Enough? More on Parity-Violation Experiments and Electroweak Gauge Theory.Andy Pickering - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:459 - 469.
Allan Franklin, Right or Wrong.Robert Ackermann - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:451-457.
Selectivity and Discord: Two Problems of Experiment.Allan Franklin - 2002 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Franklin, Holmes, and the Epistemology of Computer Simulation.Wendy S. Parker - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):165 – 183.
Do Mutants Have to Be Slain, or Do They Die of Natural Causes?: The Case of Atomic Parity Violation Experiments.Allan Franklin - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:487 - 494.
Experiment in Physics.Allan Franklin - 2007 - In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Book Review:Scientific Explanation and Atomic Physics Edward M. MacKinnon. [REVIEW]Allan Franklin - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (3):481-.
It Probably is a Valid Experimental Result: A Bayesian Approach to the Epistemology of Experiment.Allan Franklin & Colin Howson - 1988 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 19 (4):419-427.
Experiment and the Development of the Theory of Weak Interactions: Fermi's Theory.Allan Franklin - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:163 - 179.
A Bayesian Analysis of Strategies in Evolutionary Biology.David Wÿss Rudge - 1998 - Perspectives on Science 6 (4):341-360.
Conflicting Expert Testimony and the Search for Gravitational Waves.Ben Almassi - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):570-584.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads4 ( #638,977 of 2,163,682 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,682 )
How can I increase my downloads?