In Praise of Reason

MIT Press (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Can we give objective reasons for our most basic standards of reason-- our fundamental epistemic principles? I argue, against several forms of skepticism about reason, that we can, but that the reasons we can give for epistemic principles are ultimately practical, not epistemic.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Praise of Reason. [REVIEW]Allan Hazlett - 2013 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (4).
Book Review: In Praise of Reason. By Michael P. Lynch.Allan Hazlett - 2014 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 4 (1):75-79.
Lynch, Michael. In Praise of Reason. [REVIEW]Mark J. Lutz - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (2):373-375.
Review of Michael Lynch, In Praise of Reason.Dennis Whitcomb - 2012 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
Review of "In Praise of Reason". [REVIEW]William Simkulet - 2013 - Essays in Philosophy 14 (2):323-327.
Conclusion: In Praise of Reason after All.Dan Sperber & Hugo Mercier - 2017 - In Dan Sperber & Hugo Mercier (eds.), The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press. pp. 328-336.
Agency, Akrasia, and the Normative Environment.Gregory Antill - 2019 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (3):321-338.


Added to PP

67 (#249,240)

6 months
7 (#491,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Lynch
University of Connecticut

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references