Revisiting the Cultural Dope

Human Studies 35 (2):223-233 (2012)
This essay focuses on the "cultural dope," an ironic reference in Harold Garfinkel's Studies in Ethnomethodology to the rule-following actor in conventional sociological theories. In the nearly half-century since the publication of that book, the "cultural dope" has been incorporated into numerous criticisms of "models of man" in the human sciences. Garfinkel's account appeals to many writers because it seems to present an alternative picture of the actor: an individual who is self-aware, reflective, and skilled in the conduct of daily affairs. A problem with such a generalized picture of the actor is that it may seem to encourage uncritical acceptance of whatever "the public" (or a broad segment of the public) happens to believe or support. This paper revisits Garfinkel's account of the cultural dope, and contrasts "conservative" and "radical" readings of what Garfinkel does with that figure. The "conservative" reading leaves the edifice of a social-structural model largely intact, and provides an alternative, more complex, picture of individual action than that of a cultural dope. The "radical" reading places relevant social structures in a dependent relation to the contingencies of action, and thus destabilizes the very theoretical edifice that sets up the problem of how to integrate individual actions with stable social structures. In line with the "radical" reading, this paper suggests that Garfinkel creates serious difficulty for any generalized "model of man," regardless of whether it portrays the individual as active or passive, well-informed or ignorant, or reflexive or not
Keywords Harold Garfinkel  Ethnomethodology  Cultural dope  Social theory  Cultural theory
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10746-012-9227-z
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,645
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Outline of a Theory of Practice.Pierre Bourdieu - 1981 - Human Studies 4 (3):273-278.
Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action.Alfred Schuetz - 1953 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (1):1-38.
Lectures on Conversation.Harvey Sacks & Gail Jefferson - 1995 - Human Studies 18 (2):327-336.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Britain's Best-Loved Dope Dealer.Howard Marks & Julian Baggini - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 54 (54):121-126.
Why Athletic Doping Should Be Banned.Eric Chwang - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):33-49.
Critical Theory Today: Revisiting the Classics.D. Kellner - 1993 - Theory, Culture and Society 10 (2):43-60.
Personal Autonomy and Cultural Tradition.Monique Deveaux - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:87-92.
Defence of Cultural Relativism.Seungbae Park - 2011 - Cultura 8 (1):159-170.
Culture Evolves Only If There is Cultural Inheritance.Robert Aunger - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):347-348.
Cultural Traits and Cultural Integration.R. Lee Lyman - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):357-358.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

9 ( #447,405 of 2,143,470 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #386,634 of 2,143,470 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums