Are luddites confused?

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):381 – 403 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

General opposition to 'progress' is often seen as involving a personification of technology as an evil spirit. One version of 'luddism' is defended here as worthy of serious debate. ('Luddism' is an attempt to justify a general presumption that technical progress is bad for us, so technical innovations should not count as true achievement.) Our luddite says, 'If technical powers, misused, will cause more harm than good, these powers should count as bad. And such harmful misuse is likely, since the dramatic, half-blind changes resulting from technology will shortly damage world systems, swamping their adjustment-mechanisms. “Superhuman”; powers go sour with merely human wisdom. “Know-how”; tends inherently to pull ahead of “know-whether”; '. This version of luddism is contrasted with various caricatures; luddite research priorities are outlined. Serious discussion is invited of the dangers inherent in further empowering fallible humanity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,310

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-05

Downloads
23 (#495,604)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Plato's Attempt to Moralize Shame.Dan Lyons - 2011 - Philosophy 86 (3):353-374.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references