Conflicting evidence and decisions by agency professionals: an experimental test in the context of merger regulation

Theory and Decision 73 (3):465-499 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many important regulatory decisions are taken by professionals employing limited and conflicting evidence. We conduct an experiment in a merger regulation setting, identifying the role of different standards of proof, volumes of evidence, cost of error and professional or lay decision making. The experiment was conducted on current practitioners from 11 different jurisdictions, in addition to student subjects. Legal standards of proof significantly affect decisions. There are specific differences because of professional judgment, including in how error costs and volume of evidence are taken into account. We narrow the range of explanations for why professional decision making matters

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,569

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revised Robertson's Test Theory of Special Relativity.José G. Vargas - 1984 - Foundations of Physics 14 (7):625-651.
Estimating Merging Costs by Merger Preconditions.Jingang Zhao - 2009 - Theory and Decision 66 (4):373-399.
Evidence, Proof, and Facts: A Book of Sources.Peter Murphy (ed.) - 2003 - New York ;Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
31 (#374,053)

6 months
1 (#418,511)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references