Conflicting evidence and decisions by agency professionals: an experimental test in the context of merger regulation
Theory and Decision 73 (3):465-499 (2012)
AbstractMany important regulatory decisions are taken by professionals employing limited and conflicting evidence. We conduct an experiment in a merger regulation setting, identifying the role of different standards of proof, volumes of evidence, cost of error and professional or lay decision making. The experiment was conducted on current practitioners from 11 different jurisdictions, in addition to student subjects. Legal standards of proof significantly affect decisions. There are specific differences because of professional judgment, including in how error costs and volume of evidence are taken into account. We narrow the range of explanations for why professional decision making matters
Similar books and articles
An Empirical and Ethical Analysis of Factors Motivating Managers' Merger Decisions.Francis K. Achampong & Wold Zemedkun - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (10):855 - 865.
Persepsi terhadap merger Dan motivasi kerja.Ayoe Permatasary & Rostiana D. Nurdjajadi - 2008 - Phronesis (Misc) 10 (2).
Doxastic Decisions and Controlling Belief.Andrei A. Buckareff - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (1):102-114.
The Self-Fulfilling Property of Trust: An Experimental Study. [REVIEW]Michael Bacharach, Gerardo Guerra & Daniel John Zizzo - 2007 - Theory and Decision 63 (4):349-388.
Revised Robertson's Test Theory of Special Relativity.José G. Vargas - 1984 - Foundations of Physics 14 (7):625-651.
The Burden of Proof and Its Role in Argumentation.Ulrike Hahn & Mike Oaksford - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (1):39-61.
Estimating Merging Costs by Merger Preconditions.Jingang Zhao - 2009 - Theory and Decision 66 (4):373-399.
Conflicting Violations of Transitivity and Where They May Lead Us.Brett Day & Graham Loomes - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (1-2):233-242.
An Experiment on Rational Insurance Decisions.Richard Watt, Francisco J. Vázquez & Ignacio Moreno - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):247-296.
Evidence, Proof, and Facts: A Book of Sources.Peter Murphy (ed.) - 2003 - New York ;Oxford University Press.
‘Doctor, What Would You Do in My Position?’ Health Professionals and the Decision-Making Process in Pregnancy Monitoring.Solène Gouilhers Hertig, Samuele Cavalli, Claudine Burton-Jeangros & Bernice S. Elger - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5):310-314.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads