- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Four Challenges to Epistemic Scientific Realism—and the Socratic Alternative
Spontaneous Generations 9 (1):146-150 (2018)
Abstract
Four Challenges to Epistemic Scientific Realism—and the Socratic Alternative.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Epistemic selectivity, historical threats, and the non-epistemic tenets of scientific realism.Timothy D. Lyons - 2017 - Synthese 194 (9):3203-3219.
What Is Perspectivism, and Does It Count as Realism?Paul Teller - 2020 - In Michela Massimi & Casey D. McCoy (eds.), Understanding Perspectivism (Open Access): Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects. New York, NY, USA: Routledge. pp. 49-64.
Realism versus relativism in ethics.John Anderson - 1933 - Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 11 (1):1-11.
'Socratic Moral Realism: An Alternative Justification.Theodore Scaltsas - 1989 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 7:129-50.
Review of Michela Massimi and Casey D. McCoy’s Understanding Perspectivism: Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects - Michela Massimi and Casey D. McCoy, Understanding Perspectivism: Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects. New York: Routledge (2020), 210 pp. $136 (hardcover). [REVIEW]Oscar Westerblad - 2024 - Philosophy of Science 91 (1):253-257.
Scientific Realism.Timothy D. Lyons - 2014 - In Paul Humphreys (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 564-584.
Scientific Realism and the History of Chemistry.Robin Hendry - 2018 - Spontaneous Generations 9 (1):108-117.
Quo Vadis Selective Scientific Realism?Peter Vickers - 2018 - Spontaneous Generations 9 (1):118-121.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-02-16
Downloads
861 (#20,792)
6 months
141 (#39,595)
2018-02-16
Downloads
861 (#20,792)
6 months
141 (#39,595)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
In Defense of Realism and Selectivism from Lyons’s Objections.Seungbae Park - 2019 - Foundations of Science 24 (4):605-615.
Realizm naukowy wobec zmiany teorii w nauce.Janina Buczkowska - 2020 - Studia Philosophiae Christianae 56 (3):5-30.
References found in this work
Scientific Realism and the Pessimistic Meta-Modus Tollens.Timothy D. Lyons - 2010 - In S. Clarke & T. D. Lyons (eds.), Recent Themes in the Philosophy of Science: Scientific Realism and Commonsense. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 63-90.
Scientific realism and the stratagema de divide et impera.Timothy D. Lyons - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):537-560.
Explaining the Success of a Scientific Theory.Timothy D. Lyons - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):891-901.
Scientific Realism.Timothy D. Lyons - 2014 - In Paul Humphreys (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 564-584.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d5f778f9-jvlnf uwo