Is Hart's Rationale for Legal Excuses Workable?

Dialogue 8 (3):496-502 (1969)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0012217300042001
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,157
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited.F. Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Hart, Legal Rules and Palm Tree Justice.Wilfrid J. Waluchow - 1985 - Law and Philosophy 4 (1):41 - 70.
Hart and Feinberg on Responsibility.John Gardner - 2008 - In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), The Legacy of H. Oxford University Press.
Excuses, Excuses.Marcia Baron - 2006 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):21-39.
In Defense of Hart.Matthew H. Kramer - 2013 - In Wil Waluchow & Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oxford University Press. pp. 22.
On Hart's Ways : Law as Reason and as Fact.John Finnis - 2008 - In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), American Journal of Jurisprudence. Oxford University Press. pp. 25-53.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-25

Total downloads

6 ( #560,524 of 2,171,928 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,615 of 2,171,928 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums