Protecting Animals versus the Pursuit of Knowledge: The Evolution of the British Animal Research Policy Process
Society and Animals 19 (4):356-367 (2011)
AbstractAnimal research in the United Kingdom is regulated by the Animals Act 1986, which requires a government minister to weigh the expected suffering of animals against the expected benefits of a proposed animal research project—the “cost-benefit assessment”—before licensing the project. Research into the implementation of this legislation has been severely constrained by statutory confidentiality. This paper overcomes this hindrance by describing a critical case study based on unprecedented primary data: pig-to-primate organ transplantation conducted between 1995 and 2000. It reveals that researchers and regulators significantly underestimated the adverse effects suffered by the animals involved, while overestimating the scientific and medical benefits likely to accrue. Applying dynamic policy network analysis to this case in the context of the evolution of animal research policy indicates that an elitist, policy community type network has persisted since shortly after the network’s formation in 1876. Animal research interests have repeatedly withstood pressure for change from animal protection groups because of their greater resources, structural advantages, and a culture of secrecy that facilitates an implementation gap in animal research regulation
Similar books and articles
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees: A New Set of Clothes for the Emperor?Lawrence Finsen - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):145-158.
Animal Research Ethics in Africa: Is Tanzania Making Progress?Misago Seth & Fredy Saguti - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 12 (3):158-162.
Human and Animal Research Guidelines: Aligning Ethical Constructs with New Scientific Developments.Hope Ferdowsian - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (8):472-478.
Gender Differences in Attitudes Toward Animal Research.Jennifer J. Eldridge & John P. Gluck - 1996 - Ethics and Behavior 6 (3):239 – 256.
Commentary on “the Gladiator Sparrow: Ethical Issues in Behavioral Research on Captive Populations of Wild Animals”.Lida Anestidou - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):731-734.
Commentary on “the Gladiator Sparrow: Ethical Issues in Behavioral Research on Captive Populations of Wild Animals”.Todd M. Freeberg - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):721-725.
Commentary on “the Gladiator Sparrow: Ethical Issues in Behavioral Research on Captive Populations of Wild Animals”.Brian Schrag - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):726-730.
The Foundations of Attitudes About Animal Research.Donald A. Saucier & Mary E. Cain - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (2):117 – 133.
The Ethics of Animal Research: What Are the Prospects for Agreement?David Degrazia - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (1):23-34.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Locating the ‘Culture Wars’ in Laboratory Animal Research: National Constitutions and Global Competition.Gail Davies - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89:177-187.
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance.Sarah Hartley & Carmen McLeod - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (4):723-741.
References found in this work
No references found.