Timothy D. Lyons
Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
According to standard scientific realism, science seeks truth and we can justifiably believe that our successful theories achieve, or at least approximate, that goal. In this paper, I discuss the implications of the following competitor thesis: Any theory we may favor has competitors such that we cannot justifiably deny that they are approximately true. After defending that thesis, I articulate three specific threats it poses for standard scientific realism; one is epistemic, the other two are axiological (that is, pertaining to the claim that science seeks truth). I also flag an additional axiological “challenge,” that of how one might justify the pursuit of a primary aim, such as truth. Bracketing epistemic realism, I argue that the axiological threats can be addressed by embracing a refined realist axiological hypothesis, one that specifies a specific subclass of true claims sought in science. And after identifying three potential responses to the axiological “challenge,” I contend that, while standard axiological realism appears to lack the resources required to utilize any of the responses, the refined realist axiology I embrace is well suited to each
Keywords Aims of science  Axiological realism  Scientific realism  Underdetermination of theories by data
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10838-011-9168-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1993 - Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
The Scientific Image.Michael Friedman - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy 79 (5):274-283.
The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):421-423.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Laudan's Model of Axiological Change and the Bohr-Einstein Debate.Henry J. Folse - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:77 - 88.
Axiology, Realism, and the Problem of Evil.Thomas L. Carson - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):349–368.
Aimless Science.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2014 - Synthese 191 (6):1211-1221.
Non‐Competitor Conditions in the Scientific Realism Debate.Timothy D. Lyons - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (1):65-84.
Renormalizing Epistemology.Jarrett Leplin - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):20-33.
Theory Status, Inductive Realism, and Approximate Truth: No Miracles, No Charades.Shelby D. Hunt - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):159 - 178.
How to Split a Theory: Defending Selective Realism and Convergence Without Proximity.David Harker - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (1):79-106.
Why Does Laudan’s Confutation of Convergent Realism Fail?Antonio Diéguez-Lucena - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):393 - 403.
Internal Realism.Brian Ellis - 1988 - Synthese 76 (3):409 - 434.
Scientific Realism, Ramsey Sentences and the Reference of Theoretical Terms.Pierre Cruse - 2004 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (2 & 3):133 – 149.


Added to PP index

Total views
294 ( #28,710 of 2,421,925 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #35,854 of 2,421,925 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes