In A. Hieke & H. Leitgeb (eds.), Reduction - Abstraction - Analysis. Ontos. pp. 79 (2009)
Multiple Realizability (MR) must still be regarded as one of the principal arguments against type reductionist accounts of higher-order properties and their special laws. Against this I argue that there is no unique MR but rather a multitude of MR categories. In a slogan: MR is itself “multi-realized”. If this is true then we cannot expect one unique reductionist strategy against MR as an anti-reductionist argument. The main task is rather to develop a taxonomy of the wide variety of MR cases and to sketch possible reductionist answers for each class of cases. The paper outlines some first steps in this direction.
|Keywords||multiple realizability reduction shared properties approximation and idealization|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Multiple Realizability and Reduction: A Defense of the Disjunctive Move.Sven Walter - 2006 - Metaphysica 7 (1):43-65.
A Liberal Conception of Multiple Realizability.Eric Funkhouser - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (3):467-494.
Testing Multiple Realizability: A Discussion of Bechtel and Mundale.Sungsu Kim - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (4):606-610.
Connectionism, Reduction, and Multiple Realizability.John Bickle - 1995 - Behavior and Philosophy 23 (2):29-39.
Multiple-Realizability, Explanation and the Disjunctive Move.William Jaworski - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (3):289 - 308.
Added to index2009-03-07
Total downloads355 ( #7,586 of 2,158,685 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #18,261 of 2,158,685 )
How can I increase my downloads?