BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):1 (2016)

Authors
Abstract
In the field of health technology assessment, there are several approaches that can be used for ethical analysis. However, there is a scarcity of literature that critically evaluates and compares the strength and weaknesses of these approaches when they are applied in practice. In this paper, we analyse the applicability of some selected approaches for addressing ethical issues in HTA in the field of complex health interventions. Complex health interventions have been the focus of methodological attention in HTA. However, the potential methodological challenges for ethical analysis are as yet unknown.Six of the most frequently described and applied ethical approaches in HTA were critically assessed against a set of five characteristics of complex health interventions: multiple and changing perspectives, indeterminate phenomena, uncertain causality, unpredictable outcomes, and ethical complexity. The assessments are based on literature and the authors’ experiences of developing, applying and assessing the approaches.The Interactive, participatory HTA approach is by its nature and flexibility, applicable across most complexity characteristics. Wide Reflective Equilibrium is also flexible and its openness to different perspectives makes it better suited for complex health interventions than more rigid conventional approaches, such as Principlism and Casuistry. Approaches developed for HTA purposes are fairly applicable for complex health interventions, which one could expect because they include various ethical perspectives, such as the HTA Core Model® and the Socratic approach.This study shows how the applicability for addressing ethical issues in HTA of complex health interventions differs between the selected ethical approaches. Knowledge about these differences may be helpful when choosing and applying an approach for ethical analyses in HTA. We believe that the study contributes to increasing awareness and interest of the ethical aspects of complex health interventions in general
Keywords Health technology assessment  bioethics  complex health intervention
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1186/s12910-016-0099-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Public Health Ethics: The Voices of Practitioners.Ruth Gaare Bernheim - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (s4):104-109.
€œDo You Have a Healthy Smile?€.Jos V. M. Welie - 1999 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (2):169-180.
The Ethics of Evaluating Obesity Intervention Studies on Children.Dita Wickins-Drazilova & Garrath Williams - 2011 - International Journal of Obesity 35 (supplement):S24-S29.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-03-23

Total views
20 ( #555,277 of 2,499,376 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,166 of 2,499,376 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes