Marginalizing Experience: A Critical Analysis of Public Discourse Surrounding Stem Cell Research in Australia (2005–6) [Book Review]
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):191-202 (2011)
Over the past decade, stem cell science has generated considerable public and political debate. These debates tend to focus on issues concerning the protection of nascent human life and the need to generate medical and therapeutic treatments for the sick and vulnerable. The framing of the public debate around these issues not only dichotomises and oversimplifies the issues at stake, but tends to marginalise certain types of voices, such as the women who donate their eggs and/or embryos to stem cell research and the patients who might benefit from its potential clinical outcomes. This paper draws on empirical research conducted on a recent stem cell policy episode in Australia. From the qualitative examination of 109 newspaper opinion editorials and twenty-three in-depth interviews, it is argued that these voices are marginalised because they are based on discourses that have less epistemological status in public debate. Our results suggest that the personal experiences of women and patients are marginalised by the alliances that form between more powerful discourse communities that use science as a source of authority and legitimation. It is argued that members of these communities establish legitimacy and assert authority in public debate by discursively deploying science in claims that marginalise other epistemologies. Implications are discussed along with suggestions for a more enriched and inclusive public debate
|Keywords||Stem cells Cloning Bioethics Public policy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Stem Cell Tourism and the Power of Hope.Charles Murdoch & Christopher Thomas Scott - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (5):16-23.
Is There a Real Nexus Between Ethics and Aesthetics?John Miles Little - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):91-102.
Global Governance in Human Embryonic Stem Cell Science: Standardisation and Bioethics in Research and Patenting.Catherine Waldby & Brian Salter - 2008 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2 (1).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Broadening the Scope of Debates Around Stem Cell Research.Tamra Lysaght & Alastair V. Campbell - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (5):251-256.
The Scope of Public Discourse Surrounding Proposition 71: Looking Beyond the Moral Status of the Embryo. [REVIEW]Tamra Lysaght, Rachel A. Ankeny & Ian Kerridge - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):109-119.
Stem Cell Research as Innovation: Expanding the Ethical and Policy Conversation.Rebecca Dresser - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (2):332-341.
Uncertain Translation, Uncertain Benefit and Uncertain Risk: Ethical Challenges Facing First-in-Human Trials of Induced Pluripotent Stem (Ips) Cells.Ronald K. F. Fung & Ian H. Kerridge - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (2):89-96.
The Stem Cell Debate Continues: The Buying and Selling of Eggs for Research.Françoise Baylis & Carolyn McLeod - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (12):726-731.
Canada's Stem Cell Corporation: Aggregate Concerns and the Question of Public Trust. [REVIEW]Matthew Herder & Jennifer Dyck Brian - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):73 - 84.
The Law and Politics of Embryo Research in America.O. Snead - 2011 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 17 (1):40-52.
The Roles and Responsibilities of Physicians in Patients' Decisions About Unproven Stem Cell Therapies.Aaron D. Levine & Leslie E. Wolf - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 40 (1):122-134.
On the German Debate on Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Jan P. Beckmann - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):603 – 621.
Stem Cell Research: An Ethical Evaluation of Policy Options.Nikolaus Knoepffler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):55-74.
Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: An Intercultural Perspective.LeRoy Walters - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):3-38.
Will Embryonic Stem Cells Change Health Policy?William M. Sage - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (2):342-351.
Creating Donors: The 2005 Swiss Law on Donation of 'Spare' Embryos to hESC Research. [REVIEW]Jackie Leach Scully & Christoph Rehmann-Sutter - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):81-93.
Review of K. R. Monroe, R. B. Miller, and J. Tobis. Fundamentals of the Stem Cell Debate: The Scientific, Religious, Ethical and Political Issues . Review of C. B. Cohen. Renewing the Stuff of Life: Stem Cells, Ethics, and Public Policy . Review of R. Korobkin with S. R. Munzer. Stem Cell Century: Law and Policy for a Breakthrough Technology. [REVIEW]Insoo Hyun - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):57 – 59.
Moral Complicity in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Research.Mark T. Brown - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 1-22.
Added to index2011-03-25
Total downloads18 ( #271,773 of 2,171,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?