Philosophical Issues 20 (1):226-265 (2010)
Reflection on skeptical scenarios in the philosophy of perception, made vivid in the arguments from illusion and hallucination, have led to the formulation of theories of the metaphysical and epistemological nature of perceptual experience. In recent times, the locus of the debate concerning the nature of perceptual experience has been the dispute between disjunctivists and common-kind theorists. Disjunctivists have held that there are substantial dissimilarities (either metaphysical or epistemological or both) between veridical perceptual experiences occurring when one perceives and perceptual experiences involved in hallucination. Common-kind theorists have denied this. In this paper, I examine the nature of introspection – a faculty that has often been compared and contrasted to perception. I reflect on cases where introspection goes wrong in ways analogous to that in which our perceptual faculties can go wrong and formulate, what I take to be, an attractive theory of introspection. The cases that I focus on in which things go wrong are the case of zombies and the case of subjects with Anton’s syndrome. (Anton’s syndrome is a condition in which people who are blind claim that they can see.) I suggest that, just as it is possible to be a disjunctivist about perception, it is possible to be a disjunctivist about introspection. I argue that this is a good view of one type of introspection, namely, introspection of states that have phenomenal character, such as perceptual experiences. It has a good account to give of the cases in which such introspection seems to go wrong and it yields a plausible metaphysical and epistemological view of the nature of introspection. However, while I favour a disjunctive view of introspection, I do not favour a disjunctive view of perception. And, I suspect, that many disjunctivists about perception would not wish to condone my disjunctivist theory of introspection. I therefore go on to examine to what extent..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
Citations of this work BETA
On the Unreliability of Introspection.Declan Smithies - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):1177-1186.
On a Confusion About Which Intuitions to Trust: From the Hard Problem to a Not Easy One.Miguel Ángel Sebastián - forthcoming - Topoi:1-10.
Similar books and articles
Perception, Introspection and Attention.Johannes Roessler - 1999 - European Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):47-64.
Introspection and the Secret Agent.Natika Newton - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):629-629.
The Mind's "I" and the Theory of Mind's "I": Introspection and Two Concepts of Self.Shaun Nichols - 2000 - Philosophical Topics 28 (2):171-99.
A Perceptual Theory of Knowledge: Specifying Some Details.Aaro Toomela - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):633-634.
The Phenomenal Character of Experience.Sydney Shoemaker - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (2).
Introspection and its Objects.Denis G. Arnold - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22 (April):87-94.
Added to index2010-06-21
Total downloads112 ( #41,029 of 2,132,880 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #197,287 of 2,132,880 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.