Analizzare l’argomentazione sui social media. Il caso dei tweet di Salvini

Sistemi Intelligenti 3 (31):601-632 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Twitter is an instrument used not only for sharing public or personal information, but also for persuading the audience. While specific platforms and software have been developed for analyzing macro-analytical data, and specific studies have focused on the linguistic dimension of the tweets, the argumentative dimension of the latter is unexplored to this date. This paper intends to propose a method grounded on the tools advanced in argumentation theory for capturing, coding, and assessing the different argumentative dimensions of the messages posted on Twitter, focusing on the types of argument communicated, the quality of their premises, and the fallacies committed – including the use of unshared presuppositions and emotive words. This method is applied to a corpus of 843 tweets published by the Italian Minister of the Interior, Mr. Matteo Salvini, from the date of his appointment to the beginning of his campaign for the European elections. The quantitative data provide general indications for detecting the strategies that characterize the argumentative profile of Salvini, which are then analyzed qualitatively.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Saggi sull'argomentazione giuridica.Massimo Mancini (ed.) - 2017 - Turin, Italy: Giappichelli.
Note sul rapporto tra azioni, veritÀ e politica.Leonardo Caffo - 2012 - Società Degli Individui 44:145-150.
Social Media, Financial Algorithms and the Hack Crash.Tero Karppi & Kate Crawford - 2016 - Theory, Culture and Society 33 (1):73-92.
Dimostrazione e argomentazione.Ch Perelman - 1956 - Rivista di Filosofia 47 (4):379.
Argomentazione e retorica in Perelman.V. Stella - 1963 - Giornale di Metafisica 18:165.


Added to PP

200 (#100,171)

6 months
86 (#54,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fabrizio Macagno
Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa

References found in this work

Argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.
Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning.Douglas N. Walton - 1996 - Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Emotive Language in Argumentation.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2014 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy.Douglas Walton - 2003 - University Alabama Press.

View all 44 references / Add more references