Bodily Contributions to Emotion: Schachter’s Legacy for a Psychological Constructionist View on Emotion

Emotion Review 9 (1):36-45 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although early emotion theorists posited that bodily changes contribute to emotion, the primary view in affective science over the last century has been that emotions produce bodily changes. Recent findings from physiology, neuroscience, and neuropsychology support the early intuition that body representations can help constitute emotion. These findings are consistent with the modern psychological constructionist hypothesis that emotions emerge when representations of bodily changes are conceptualized as an instance of emotion. We begin by introducing the psychological constructionist approach to emotion. With Schachter as inspiration, we next examine how embodied representations contribute to affective states, and ultimately emotion, with inflammation as a key example. We close by looking forward to future research on how body representations contribute to human experience.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Language is Powerful.Kristen A. Lindquist - 2009 - Emotion Review 1 (1):16-18.
Emotions as Unities of Form and Matter.Maria Magoula Adamos - 2006 - The Emotion Researcher 22 (1-2):09-10.
Do discrete emotions exist?Yang-Ming Huang, Maria Gendron & Lisa Feldman Barrett - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (4):427-437.
“Emotion”: One Word, Many Concepts.Thomas Dixon - 2012 - Emotion Review 4 (4):387-388.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-15

Downloads
21 (#738,616)

6 months
5 (#641,756)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Principles of Psychology.William James - 1890 - London, England: Dover Publications.
The Principles of Psychology.William James - 1891 - International Journal of Ethics 1 (2):143-169.

View all 24 references / Add more references