Belief-in Revisited: A Reply to Williams

Religious Studies 30 (4):487 - 503 (1994)

Abstract

In 'Belief-In and Belief in God' ("Religious Studies", 28, 1992), J. N. Williams suggests that belief in God cannot be rational unless one has rational beliefs that God exists. While agreeing with his conclusion (though not with his statement of it), I disagree at almost every step with his method of arriving at it. In particular I suggest that Williams goes astray concerning the dual aspect of belief in, the nature of performatives, the arousal of belief states, and the correct account of belief in God.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,694

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
46 (#250,215)

6 months
5 (#136,367)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jack MacIntosh
Last affiliation: University of Calgary

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Wittgenstein, Dewey, and the Possibility of Religion.Scott F. Aikin & Michael P. Hodges - 2006 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 20 (1):1-19.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles