Backing the Founders: The Case for Unalienable Individual Rights
Libertarian Papers 2:42 (2010)
Many may benefit from revisiting the natural rights support for the fully free society even though the case is on record in several books and numerous scholarly pieces. Here I provide a sketch of that support, with a plethora of references for those who would like to explore the full case.The basic point is that adult human beings are moral agents and as such require in their communities respect for–and at times expert protection of–their individual natural rights. This is what gives rise to a polity of very limited government or law. Like referees at a game, whoever maintains and defends the law must stick to that job and not stray into other projects lest the work become corrupted. Such a society will not guarantee good conduct or prosperity but will have the best chance at these
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Are Cultural Group Rights Against Individual Rights?Erol Kuyurtar - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:51-59.
The Moderate Communitarian Individual and the Primacy of Duties.J. O. Famakinwa - 2010 - Theoria 76 (2):152-166.
Towards a Theory of Natural Individual Human Rights.Tibor R. Machan - 1987 - New Scholasticism 61 (1):33-78.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Moral Truth.Mark Schroeder - forthcoming - In Michael Glanzburg (ed.), Oxford Handbook to Truth. Oxford University Press.
Specifying Rights Out of Necessity.John Oberdiek - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1):19.
Added to index2010-12-17
Total downloads24 ( #213,084 of 2,178,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,178 )
How can I increase my downloads?