Dialogue 33 (01):3-20 (1994)
Quentin Smith argues that if God exists, He had a duty to ensure life's existence; and He couldn't rationally have done so and made a big bang unless a counter-factual like "If God had made a big bang, there would have been life," was true pre-creation. But such counter-factuals are not true pre-creation. I argue that God could have made a big bang without irrationality; and that He could have ensured life without making big bangs non-random. Further, a proper understanding of the truth-conditions of counter-factuals like the one above lets them have determinate truth-values pre-creation. But the explanation of how the above counter-factual can be true pre-creation is more complicated than that offered by William Lane Craig.
|Keywords||God Big Bang Random Philosophical Cosmology The Problem of Evil Quentin Smith William Lane Craig universe creation counterfactuals|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology.William Lane Craig & Quentin Smith - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
A Big Bang Cosmological Argument?Dennis Temple - 1995 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 2 (2):11-16.
Did the Big Bang Have a Cause?Quentin Smith - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):649-668.
Hartshorne's Process Theism and Big Bang Cosmology Revisited.Bryant Keeling - 2008 - Process Studies 37 (1):92-103.
A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence.Quentin Smith - 1992 - Faith and Philosophy 9 (2):217-237.
Added to index2010-09-25
Total downloads163 ( #28,119 of 2,163,987 )
Recent downloads (6 months)29 ( #11,262 of 2,163,987 )
How can I increase my downloads?