British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (43):222-223 (1960)
Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1093/bjps/XI.43.222 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Using Electronic Discussion Boards to Teach Responsible Conduct of Research.David B. Resnik - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):617-630.
What Shifts? : Thresholds, Standards, or Alternatives?Jonathan Schaffer - 2005 - In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford University Press.
The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussions.M. A. van Rees - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):457-470.
Argumentative Bluff in Eristic Discussion: An Analysis and Evaluation.Jan Albert van Laar - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):383-398.
Consensus and Power in Deliberative Democracy.Tim6 Heysse - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (3):265 – 289.
Reasoning with Limited Resources and Assigning Probabilities to Arithmetical Statements.Haim Gaifman - 2004 - Synthese 140 (1-2):97 - 119.
Discussion: Physics and Chemistry: Comments on Caldin's View of Chemistry.D. K. C. Macdonald - 1960 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (43):222-223.
The 4-Step Approach. Ethics Case Discussion in Hospitals.Andrea Dörries - 2009 - Diametros 22:39-46.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-09-02
Total views
6 ( #1,070,456 of 2,412,036 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,412,036 )
2010-09-02
Total views
6 ( #1,070,456 of 2,412,036 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,412,036 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads