Informal Logic 39 (3):229-261 (2019)

Authors
Fabrizio Macagno
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Douglas Walton
University of Windsor
Abstract
Donald Trump’s speeches and messages are characterized by terms that are commonly referred to as “thick” or “emotive,” meaning that they are characterized by a tendency to be used to generate emotive reactions. This paper investigates how emotive meaning is related to emotions, and how it is generated or manipulated. Emotive meaning is analyzed as an evaluative conclusion that results from inferences triggered by the use of a term, which can be represented and assessed using argumentation schemes. The evaluative inferences are regarded as part of the connotation of emotive words, which can be modified and stabilized by means of recontextualizations. The manipulative risks underlying the misuse and the redefinition of emotive words are accounted for in terms of presuppositions and implicit modifications of the interlocutors’ commitments.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.22329/il.v39i3.5493
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,756
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How Does Moral Judgment Work?Joshua Greene & Jonathan Haidt - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (12):517-523.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Argumentative Structure of Persuasive Definitions.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (5):525-549.
Emotive Equilibria.Eric McCready - 2012 - Linguistics and Philosophy 35 (3):243-283.
Emotive Language in Argumentation.Michael Gilbert - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (3):337-340.
The Language of Ethics. [REVIEW]R. G. E.: - 1962 - Review of Metaphysics 15 (3):531-531.
A Note on the Emotive Theory.Jon Wheatley - 1959 - Philosophy 34 (130):235 - 236.
Fiction, Belief and Emotive Response.Sarah Elizabeth Worth - 1997 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.Roomet Jakapi - 2002 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (3):401 – 411.
Theories of Metaphor.Sherrill Jean Begres - 1986 - Dissertation, Wayne State University
The Argumentative Uses of Emotive Language .Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2010 - Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación 1:1-37.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-01

Total views
6 ( #1,030,795 of 2,333,914 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #585,936 of 2,333,914 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes