End of life decision making, policy and the criminal justice system: Untrained carers assuming responsibility (UCARes) and their uncertain legal liabilities

Genomics, Society and Policy 2 (1):118-128 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article will explore some previously unrecognised legal and ethical issues associated with informal care-giving and criminal justice in the context of end of life decision-making. It was prompted by a recent case in Leeds Crown Court, which raises important issues for the people who care for their loved ones at home and for the criminal justice system more generally. Government figures estimate that over 5.2 million Britons are responsible for the care of relatives or loved ones. In order to evaluate some of the ways in which they might find themselves exposed to unexpected criminal liability we have characterised this group as untrained carers who assume responsibility



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,678

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Criminal process and prosecution.Jacqueline Hodgson & Andrew Roberts - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Neuroscience and Criminal Law: Perils and Promises.Stephen J. Morse - 2019 - In Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law. Springer Verlag. pp. 471-496.
""The" Ultimate Issue" Problem in the Canadian Criminal Justice System.Marc Nesca - 2009 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 2 (1):11.


Added to PP

41 (#385,887)

6 months
9 (#455,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hannah Biggs
Calvin College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references