Ethics and Behavior 24 (2):126-150 (2014)

Abstract
Case-based reasoning has long been used to facilitate instructional effectiveness. Although much remains to be known concerning the most beneficial way to present case material, recent literature suggests that simplifying case material is favorable. Accordingly, the current study manipulated two instructional techniques, incremental case presentation and forecasting outcomes, in a training environment in an attempt to better understand the utility of simplified versus complicated case presentation for learning. Findings suggest that pairing these two cognitively demanding techniques reduces satisfaction and detracts from the effectiveness of the learning approach. Implications regarding the use of instructional techniques in training programs are discussed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/10508422.2013.824819
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,388
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Topics and Cases for Online Education in Engineering.Jimmy H. Smith - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):451-458.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-24

Total views
32 ( #337,881 of 2,445,419 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,182 of 2,445,419 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes