In Conversation: Ruth Macklin, Alison Reiheld, Robyn Bluhm, Sidney Callahan, and Frances Kissling Discuss the Marlise Munoz Case, Advance Directives, and Pregnant Women


Authors
Robyn Bluhm
Michigan State University
Alison Reiheld
Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville
Abstract
Feminist bioethicists of a variety of persuasions discuss the 2013 case of Marlise Munoz, a pregnant woman whose medical care was in dispute after she became brain dead.
Keywords pregnancy  brain death  surrogate decision-making
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,131
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

In Re Edna MF: Case Law Confusion in Surrogate Decision Making.Robyn S. Shapiro - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):45-54.
David A. J. Richards.Ruth Macklin, George Annas, Daniel Callahan, Leon Kass & LeRoy Walters - 1994 - In Peter Singer (ed.), Ethics. Oxford University Press.
The Perils of Protection: Vulnerability and Women in Clinical Research.Toby Schonfeld - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (3):189-206.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-01-19

Total views
1 ( #1,309,770 of 2,237,168 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #1,004,527 of 2,237,168 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature