Nurse Autonomy as Relational

Nursing Ethics 9 (2):194-201 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article seeks an improved understanding of nurse autonomy by looking at nursing through the lens of what recent feminist scholars have called ‘relational’ autonomy. A relational understanding of autonomy means a shift away from older views focused on individuals achieving independence, towards a view that seeks meaningful self-direction within a context of interdependency. The main claim made here is that nurse autonomy is, indeed, relational. The article begins with an explanation of the notion of relational autonomy. It then explains both the collective and the individual application of the term ‘professional autonomy’. Finally, it argues that both senses of professional autonomy are best understood as relational, and suggests some implications of this conclusion



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 83,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relational Autonomy: An Example from Breast Cancer Nursing.Mary Twomey - 2011 - Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (4):408-413.
Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy.N. Stoljar - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):375-384.
Relational Autonomy and the Social Dynamics of Paternalism.John Christman - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (3):369-382.


Added to PP

112 (#127,338)

6 months
1 (#497,632)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chris MacDonald
Ryerson University

References found in this work

Reworking Autonomy: Toward a Feminist Perspective.Anne Donchin - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (1):44.
Clinical Standards and the Structure of Professional Obligation.Chris MacDonald - 2000 - Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 8 (1):7-17.
Shifting the autonomy debate to theory as ideology.Carolyn Ells - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (4):417 – 430.

Add more references